History
  • No items yet
midpage
Johnson v. Lappin
3:08-cv-00730
S.D. Ill.
Mar 22, 2011
Check Treatment
Docket

*1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS RASHEED JOHNSON,

Plaintiff, v. Case No. 08-cv-730-JPG HARLEY G. LAPPIN, et al. ,

Defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) (Doc.

73) of Magistrate Philip M. Frazier recommending that the Court deny the defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute (Doc. 52).

The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. Id. “If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error.” Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp. , 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).

The Court has received no objection to the Report. The Court has reviewed the entire file and finds that the Report is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 73) and DENIES the defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute (Doc. 52).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: March 22, 2011

s/ J. Phil Gilbert J. PHIL GILBERT DISTRICT JUDGE

Case Details

Case Name: Johnson v. Lappin
Court Name: District Court, S.D. Illinois
Date Published: Mar 22, 2011
Docket Number: 3:08-cv-00730
Court Abbreviation: S.D. Ill.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.