266 S.W. 561 | Tex. App. | 1924
Appellant insists that the judgment was unauthorized because, she says, it was not shown that the relation of landlord and tenant existed between her and appellee. The contention is on the view that, unless such relation existed, appellee was not entitled to maintain an action for forcible detainer And that is the meaning of the statute as we understand it. Article 3940, Vernon's Statutes; Francis v. Holmes,