Johnson v. GoordJohnson v. Goord
- Reporters:
- ,
We confirm. The misbehavior reports, together with petitioner‘s admission that he struck and bit correction officers while they were attempting to subdue him, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Amaker v Carpenter, 28 AD3d 828, 829 [2006]; Matter of Lebron v McGinnis, 26 AD3d 658, 658 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 704 [2006]). Petitioner‘s claim that he was acting in self-defense presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Carter v Goord, 8 AD3d 771, 772 [2004]; Matter of Bingham v Goord, 302 AD2d 837, 838 [2003]). Moreover, inasmuch as petitioner told the Hearing Officer that he did not wish to call any witnesses at the hearing, there is no merit to his claim that he was improperly denied the right to call witnesses (see People ex rel. Vega v Smith, 66 NY2d 130, 142 [1985]; Matter of Morales v Selsky, 1 AD3d 848, 849 [2003], lv denied 1 NY3d 510 [2004]).
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.