59 Ind. App. 159 | Ind. Ct. App. | 1915
Appellees take the position that appellants’ brief fails so materially to comply with the rules of this court that no question is presented for our consideration. An examination of the brief reveals that appellees are correct in such contention. The brief is materially defective in the following particulars: (1) It does not disclose what the judgment or the decree below was, as required by the third clause of Eule 22, or that a judgment or decree was rendered. (2) The brief does not contain “under a separate heading of each error relied on, separately num
Judgment affirmed
Note. — Reported in 108 N. E. 967. See, also 3 C. J. 1408 ; 2 Cyc. 1013.