1 Stew. 169 | Ala. | 1827
delivered the opinion of the Court. By a former decision of this Court
By the common law, a chose in action could not be assigned so as to. authorize the assignee to maintain an action at law in his own name ; but the assignment operated as an authority for the assignee to sue for and recover the money in the name of the payee or obligor. The act of 1812,
I am also of opinion that a writ of error lies from a judgement of nonsuit; for as to that action, the judgement is final and carries costs.
In the case of Dugan against the United States,
To consider the questions on any ground, I think the evidence was admissible, without striking out the endorsement; and that, therefore, the judgement should be reversed and the cause remanded. Judgement affirmed.
Pitts vs. Keyser & Keyser, Ante 154.
«Raws Ala. 69.
6 Laws Ala. 70.
Acts of 1824, p, 12.
as Wheat,R. 182.