History
  • No items yet
midpage
JOHNSON & Another v. WILKINS
116 U.S. 392
SCOTUS
1886
Check Treatment

6 S.Ct. 600

116 U.S. 392

29 L.Ed. 671

JOHNSON and another
v.
WILKINS.

Filed January 11, 1886.

J. D. Thompson, for plaintiffs in error.

C. C. Yonge, Sr., for defendant in error.

WAITE, C. J.

1

There is nothing in this record from which it can fairly be inferred that the value of the matter in dispute exceeds $5,000. The suit was ejectment, begun in a state court and removed to the circuit court of the United States, for a lot in Pensacola, and the profits thereof since January 1, 1880, of the yearly value of $500. The value of the lot is not stated in any of the pleadings, but in the petition for the removal of the suit it is put at 'more than five hundred dollars.' The recovery was of the lot and rent at $15 per month from January 1, 1880, until March 1, 1883, or $570 in all. If this rental is to be taken as an indication of the value of the property, it certainly must be less than our jurisdictional limit. As it rests on the plaintiffs in error to show our jurisdiction either from the record or by affidavits, and this has not been done, the writ of efror is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Case Details

Case Name: JOHNSON & Another v. WILKINS
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Jan 11, 1886
Citation: 116 U.S. 392
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.