History
  • No items yet
midpage
Johns v. State
112 S.E. 522
Ga. Ct. App.
1922
Check Treatment
Luke, J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of larceny from the house. His conviction was dependent wholly on circumstantial evidence by proof of recent possession of some of the goods alleged to have been stolen. Error is assigned upon the court’s failure to charge sufficiently the law with respect to the recent possession of stolen property. We think this criticism meritorious, and, this being one of the main issues in the case (which was a close and doubtful one), it was error for the court to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Johns v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: May 11, 1922
Citation: 112 S.E. 522
Docket Number: 13263
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.