History
  • No items yet
midpage
Johns v. Pattee
61 Iowa 393
Iowa
1883
Check Treatment
Day, On. J.

— The intervenors filed and submitted with the case a motion to dismiss the appeal, because there is no certificate of the trial judge, as required by section 3T73 of tho Code. The object of this proceeding is simply to cancel and prevent the enforcement of a judgment for $25 and $18.85 costs. The case involves simply the validity of a judgment, and not an interest in real estate. We have held that section 3173 of the-Code applies to chancery cases. See Andrews v. Burdick,* at the present term. See 16 N. W. Rep., 275. As the amount in controversy is less than $100, and there is no certificate of the judge as provided in the statute, it follows that the motion of intervention must be sustained and the appeal must be

Dismissed.

This case is yet pending upon a motion for rehearing, and is not, therefore, found in this volume.

Case Details

Case Name: Johns v. Pattee
Court Name: Supreme Court of Iowa
Date Published: Jun 15, 1883
Citation: 61 Iowa 393
Court Abbreviation: Iowa
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.