The appellant was a mere licensee as to the occupancy of the land, He had no estate in it. There was no term, and he was not a termor, and was not entitled to notice to quit. Wood’s L. & T., sect. 227, et seq.; Taylor’s L. & T., sects. 25, 60, 471.
Judgment affirmed.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
