John Stritzinger v. Katherine Wright, 03-10-00651-CV

John Stritzinger v. Katherine Wright

03-10-00651-CV

Tex. App.

Feb 10, 2015

Check Treatment

Case Information

In The Third Court of Appeals State of Texas Austin, Texas 78701 03-10-00651-CV Strteinger, Wright 03-11-651-84 RECEIVED FEB 10205 HARD COURT OF APPEALS REPRIED KNEE

PETITION TO CONSOLIDATE, RECIPEN AND MODIFY UNDER DECRETIONARY AUTHORITY OF THE COURT OF APPEALS

Appellant, John S. Strteinger is the Mowant. Appellee is James Vaught, an behals of Katherine Wright.

Jurisdiction

This Court has jurisdiction over its own orders and Sinal orders from district courts in its jurisdiction

Facts

The 345th District court entered an administrative order against appellant which it has since retracted, allowing appellant open access to the Texas Civil trial courts and the Central Docket as originally ordered by the 250th District Court in 2007, for the second time. [See Fm-ou-004000]

Before the retraction/rescinding of its administrative authority this court denied an appeal for the same reason, impacting physical custody of appellant.

Appellant would like this court to consolidate 03-11-651-CV, 03-10-655-458, and 03-10-651CV along with the 345th District court representing 1/0/10 to 06/8/12, and a third from Judge Byrne dated 04/13. Appellant requests the court request the

transcripts and orders and all docket entries for the unconsolidated periods. Appellant does not have copies of these and requests he can proceed without fees or for the court allow/order appellee to pay for transcripts from Mr. Albert Aluarez.

Prayer

Appellant prays the court will allow his siling, reopen this cause and consolidate its previous ruling under 03-10-455-CV with the causes cited. Ms. Ramos and her recommendations has been removed by court order, leaving the children without a gather, despite their health idenlished as sussicient by $1 / 10110$ . Appellant prays for a new summons to be given to Appellee on Siling, via Seesimile, as Appellant does not have sussicient resources. Appellant prays the court will find the 345th District court acted inappropriately, and inconsistent with State and Federal Law. (F. Dreveris 1988

The Supreme Court of Texas

BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK
201 West $14^{th}$ Street Post Office Box 12248 Austin, TX 78711
Telephone: 512/463-1312 Facsimile: 512/463-1365
January 7, 2015
JSS Stritzinger
4601 Ironbound Rd
Williamsburg, VA 23188

We are in receipt of your recent correspondence. We have not filed your document with the Court or assigned it a case number. Please refer to the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure for more information regarding rules of the Court. A free copy of the rules is available on our website at http://www.supreme.courts.state.tx.us.

Please refer to the check-marked box below for more information on why your document was not filed.

$◻$ The document we received is not a filing in this Court. The Supreme Court has no authority or resources to conduct investigations, or to take action in any manner which has not been raised in one of the state's trial courts and appealed through the intermediate courts of appeals.
$◻$ The Supreme Court does not provide sample forms, copies of rules or copies of other documents by mail.
$◻$ The Supreme Court is the state's highest appellate court for civil cases. The Supreme Court does not have jurisdiction over criminal cases and does not review the decisions of the Court of Criminal Appeals. See Tex. Gov't Code $§ § 22.001 - 22.002$ . The Court of Criminal Appeals has final jurisdiction over criminal matters in the State of Texas. See Tex. Gov't Code § 22.001 & Texas Constitution, Article V, Section 3. A petition for discretionary review in a criminal case must be filed with the clerk of the court of appeals. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.3.
$◻$ Your document was forwarded to the Court of Criminal Appeals. See above paragraph.
The Supreme Court does not review the decisions of federal courts. In the event that you intended to appeal the decision of a federal court to the U.S. Supreme Court, we are returning your appeal which has been stamped with the date it was received by the Supreme Court of Texas.
$◻$ The Court of Appeals case number that you reference in your filing was previously filed as a mandamus. It is not necessary to file a motion to extend time with this Court in a mandamus proceeding. If you are seeking review of the denial of a mandamus, you must file a petition for writ of mandamus that complies with Rule 52 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.
$◻$ Your petition for review has been denied, the final order was sent out and the case has been stored. The case is closed and the decision of the Court is final.

Sincerely, Bicbue a. Howethorn

Clerk, The Supreme Court of Texas

*4 The Supreme Court of Texas POST OFFICE BOX 12248 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

JSS Stritzinger 4601 Ironbound Rd Williamsburg, VA 23188