History
  • No items yet
midpage
John Stritzinger v. Bank of America
649 F. App'x 320
4th Cir.
2016
Check Treatment
Docket

John S. STRITZINGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA; Vernon Wright, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 14-2356.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 2016. Decided: May 20, 2016.

John S. Stritzinger, Appellant Pro Se.

Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John S. Stritzinger appeals the district court‘s order adopting the magistrate judge‘s recommendation and dismissing his complaint without prejudice for failing to comply with a court order.* On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant‘s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Stritzinger‘s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court‘s disposition, Stritzinger has forfeited appellate review of the court‘s order. Accordingly, we grant Stritzinger leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny the motion to remand, and affirm the district court‘s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Notes

*
We conclude that Stritzinger timely filed his notice of appeal. See Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988).

Case Details

Case Name: John Stritzinger v. Bank of America
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: May 20, 2016
Citation: 649 F. App'x 320
Docket Number: 14-2356
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In