midpage

John M. Dimidowich, Dba Micro Image v. Bell & HowellJohn M. Dimidowich, Dba Micro Image v. Bell & Howell

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Feb 25, 1987
84-1995
Versions:

ORDER

Appellant’s petition for rehearing is denied.

The opinion, filed November 6, 1986, 803 F.2d 1473 is modified as set forth following.

Insert on page 1478 second column line 17 of 803 F.2d before Nonetheless: “It will thus be rare for a court to infer a vertical combination solely from a business’s unilateral refusal to deal with distributors or customers who do not comply with certain conditions.”

Delete on page 1478 second column second line from bottom: “necessary to show a combination between himself and B & H” and replace with “necessary to infer a vertical combination from a unilateral refusal to deal.”

All petitions to file amicus briefs are denied.

Case Details

Case Name: John M. Dimidowich, Dba Micro Image v. Bell & Howell
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Feb 25, 1987
Citations: 810 F.2d 1517; 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 17851; 84-1995
Docket Number: 84-1995
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
Log In