Following discovery and a conference with the parties, the district court found ' substantial reason to suspect that the Atlas defendants had caused certain collateral to be fraudulently conveyed by, through, and to affiliated corporate defendants, to the probable detriment of a secured party which is the plaintiff in Modern Home Life Ins. Co. v. Atlas Financial Corp., et al., Civ. No. C74 — 302A, now pending before the district court. The court thereupon appointed a receiver pendente lite for the purposes of managing the defendants and marshaling the collateral together with its proceeds.
We have carefully examined the defendants’-appellants’ objections to the receivership and find them to be without merit. The appointment of a receiver, otherwise proper, is not to be defeated for lack of sworn pleading or the absence of a full evidentiary hearing.
See
Haase v. Chapman, W.D.Mo.1969,
Finding no error, the order appointing the receiver
pendente lite
is affirmed on the basis of District Judge Freeman’s well-reasoned opinion,
Notes
. See 12 Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2983, at 22-24.
