History
  • No items yet
midpage
John Deere Co. v. Phillips County
48 P.2d 793
Colo.
1935
Check Treatment

An action to recover taxes paid under protest. Judgment of dismissal entered and the taxpayer assigns error.

The proceeding was against "The County of Phillips, State of Colorado." An action so brought is not maintainable. "In all suits or proceedings, by or against a county, the name in which the county shall sue or be sued shall be, the board of county commissioners of the county of............" C.L. 1921, § 8662. Even had the taxpayer been successful below its judgment would have been unavailing. Board of County Commissioners v.Churning, 4 Colo. App. 321, 35 Pac. 918. "We have but one statutory provision concerning the manner in which a suit shall be brought against a county. It must be brought against the board of county commissioners of the county sued. That is the corporate name of the county for the purposes of the suit, and there is no authority to sue it by any other name. In this case the statutory requirement having been disregarded, the judgment is a nullity." Id. See, also, Board of Com'rsSweetwater County v. Young, 3 Wyo. 684, 29 Pac. 1002;County of Rock Island v. Steele, 31 Ill. 543; 15 C. J. 665, § 379; 7 R.C.L. 966, § 40.

Let the order be that the judgment is affirmed.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BUTLER and MR. JUSTICE BOUCK dissent.

Case Details

Case Name: John Deere Co. v. Phillips County
Court Name: Supreme Court of Colorado
Date Published: May 6, 1935
Citation: 48 P.2d 793
Docket Number: No. 13,400.
Court Abbreviation: Colo.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.