midpage

Jiminez v. City of New YorkJiminez v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Mar 9, 2004
Versions:5 A.D.3d 182
772 N.Y.S.2d 515
2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2348

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Betty Owen Stinson, J.), entered November 21, 2002, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied plaintiff’s motion for a default judgment against the six individual defendants, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

No jurisdiction was obtained over the individually named correction officers, who concededly worked at Hikers Island, by means of substituted service at the Department of Correction headquarters in Manhattan (see Lorensen v Digman, 1998 WL 37593, 1998 US Dist LEXIS 861 [ND NY, Jan. 27, 1998]). There are no disputed facts that would require a traverse hearing. In the absence of jurisdiction, these individuals were relieved of having to offer a meritorious defense or reasonable excuse for failing to answer the complaint (European Am. Bank v Legum, 248 AD2d 206, 208 [1998]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan and Gonzalez, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Jiminez v. City of New York
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Mar 9, 2004
Citations: 5 A.D.3d 182; 772 N.Y.S.2d 515; 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2348
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In