History
  • No items yet
midpage
Jiggetts v. Figueroa
21 Misc. 2d 280
N.Y. App. Term.
1959
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The instruction sheet directed that a “ patch test” he made. The jury could have found that the manufacturer so directed because there were persons who were allergic to the preparation. They could also have found from plaintiff’s reaction that she was one of those persons. A failure to discover her allergy by not making the test could be found to be negligence.

The judgment upon dismissal of complaint should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant to abide the event.

Concur — Steuer, J. P., Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Case Details

Case Name: Jiggetts v. Figueroa
Court Name: Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Date Published: Dec 3, 1959
Citation: 21 Misc. 2d 280
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Term.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.