1987 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 296 | Tax Ct. | 1987
SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OPINION
SCOTT,
Respondent in his Notice of Deficiency determined deficiencies in income tax and1987 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 296">*299 accumulated earnings tax of petitioner for the years 1976, 1977 and 1978 as follows:
Deficiency in | Accumulated | |
Year | Income Tax | Earnings Tax |
1976 | $367,621 | |
1977 | 199,800 | $446,658 |
1978 | 199,800 | 2 598,077 |
In our Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion filed August 28, 1986, we held that petitioner was liable for the accumulated earnings tax under section 531 3 for the years 1977 and 1978. We sustained petitioner in part and respondent in part with respect to the income tax deficiency for each of the years 1976, 1977 and 1978, and stated that decision would be entered under
On March 27, 1987, respondent filed his computation for entry of decision1987 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 296">*300 in the above-entitled case and on April 17, 1987, petitioner filed its notice of objection to respondent's computation and its computation for entry of decision. The computations of the deficiencies in income tax by each of the parties is the same. The only difference in the computations of the parties with respect to the deficiencies in accumulated earnings tax is that respondent, in computing accumulated earnings tax, for each of the years 1977 and 1978 did not deduct any portion of the deficiencies in income tax which were determined to be due by petitioner in our original opinion, but only the amount of income tax of petitioner for each of these years that was not contested in the petition. Petitioner in his computation deducted the entire income tax due under the opinion of this Court for each of the years 1977 and 1978 as computed in its computation which is the same as computed in respondent's computation for entry of decision under
Section 531 provides for the imposition of accumulated earnings tax on corporations. This tax is imposed on accumulated earnings taxable income as defined in
(1) Taxes. -- There shall be allowed as a deduction Federal income and excess profits taxes and income, war profits, and excess profits taxes of foreign countries and possessions of the United States (to the extent not allowable as a deduction under section 275(a)(4)), accrued during the taxable year or deemed to be paid by a domestic corporation under section 902(a) or 960(a)(1) for the taxable year, but not including the accumulated earnings tax imposed by section 531, the personal holding company tax imposed by section 541, or the taxes imposed by corresponding sections of a prior income tax law. 4
1987 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 296">*302 Petitioner in its motion states that its representative discussed with representatives of respondent the adoption of its proposed computation deducting as taxes an amount including the deficiencies for the years 1977 and 1978 determined in the
Petitioner argues that respondent's computations are inconsistent and inapplicable because they determine Federal income taxes paid for purposes of calculating petitioner's accumulated earnings tax liability by including petitioner's Federal income tax paid with its 1977 and 1978 returns and petitioner's 1977 and 1978 Federal income tax paid on February 13, 1980, but excluding the 1977 and 1978 Federal income taxes determined by this Court which petitioner intends to pay prior to the entry of decision in this case.
Petitioner misquotes the provisions of
Section 461(f) provides that contested liabilities shall be deductible in the year a transfer of money or other property in satisfaction of such liabilities is made if they would be deductible in that year or an earlier year except for the fact that the liability is contested. 5 Petitioner does not cite or rely on section 461(f), nor would it be helpful to it, since petitioner contends the income tax1987 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 296">*304 deficiencies are deductible in 1977 and 1978, the years to which they relate rather than in 1987, the year in which it proposes to pay the deficiencies.
Petitioner states that the case of
Petitioner totally misconstrues the holding in the case of
Footnotes
1. The Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion also decided the case of
James H. Rutter and Marie R. Rutter, Petitionersv. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent, docket no. 15061-81. However, the parties are not in disagreement with respect to the recomputation underRule 155 of our Rules of Practice and Procedure in the case ofJames H. and Marie R. Rutter↩ and this Supplemental Memorandum Opinion deals only with the case of the corporation.2. On November 24, 1986, the Court issued an order accompanied by a Memorandum Sur Order in this case and the related case of
James H. and Marie R. Rutter v. Commissioner,↩ which is not pertinent to the issue herein.3. Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended and in effect during the years here in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.↩
4.
Section 535(a) reads as follows:(a) Definition. -- For purposes of this subtitle, the term "accumulated taxable income" means the taxable income, adjusted in the manner provided in subsection (b), minus the sum of the dividends paid deduction (as defined in section 561) and the accumulated earnings credit (as defined in subsection (c)).↩
5. Section 461(f) provides:
(f) Contested Liabilities. -- If --
(1) the taxpayer contests an asserted liability,
(2) the taxpayer transfers money or other property to provide for the satisfaction of the asserted liability,
(3) the contest with respect to the asserted liability exists after the time of the transfer, and
(4) but for the fact that the asserted liability is contested, a deduction would be allowed for the taxable year of the transfer (or for an earlier taxable year),
then the deduction shall be allowed for the taxable year of the transfer. This subsection shall not apply in respect of the deduction for income, war profits, and excess profits taxes imposed by the authority of any foreign country or possession of the United States.↩