Jewett v. Morrison, 175 Mass. 161

Jewett v. Morrison

175 Mass. 161 | Mass. | 1900

Morton, J.

It is settled in this State that when an action is begun by trustee process, and an administrator is summoned as *162trustee, “ the lien takes effect from the service of the process, and reaches the whole interest of the debtor in the personal estate that may eventually come into the hands of the administrator.” Mechanics’ Savings Bank v. Waite, 150 Mass. 234, and cases cited. It is also said in that case, that “ since the lien is not confined to property in the administrator’s possession at the time of service, it seems to follow that it would attach even if no property were in his possession at that time.” The fact, therefore, that the funds for which the defendant was charged as trustee came to his hands after the service of the process upon him in the original action cannot avail him.

The court determined in some manner, we do not know how, the amount for which the defendant was chargeable. There is nothing before us to enable us to revise its action in that respect, even if it were revisable here. The finding implies that there was a hearing at which the amount was determined. It is stated in the defendant’s brief that there was no hearing except the argument of counsel bn the record as it now stands. But the effect of the record, it seems to us, is otherwise. The rule that the answer of a trustee on scire facias and in the original action are to be taken as true does not apply, because the defendant did not answer as to the amount which he received after the service of the writ upon him in the original action. He contended, in subtance, that he was not chargeable for what he so.received, which was plainly error.' And the court thereupon, without exception or objection on his part, so far as appears, found in some way the amount for which he was chargeable. As the case stands, we think that the appeal must be dismissed and the judgment affirmed.

So ordered.