midpage

Jett v. LordJett v. Lord

Supreme Court of Georgia
Nov 11, 1915
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Atkinson
Atkinson, J.

1. In the light of the notes by ‍‌​​‌​​​​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌​‌​​‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‍the judge and the evidence admitted without objection, the .grounds of the motion for new trial complaining ‍‌​​‌​​​​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌​‌​​‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‍of the rejection of certain evidence, in so far as they were approved by the judge, show ‍‌​​‌​​​​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌​‌​​‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‍no error requiring the grant of a new trial.

2. The verdict for the defendant was authorized by ‍‌​​‌​​​​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌​‌​​‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‍the evidence, and the discretion of the trial judge in refusing a new trial will not be ‍‌​​‌​​​​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌​‌​​‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‍disturbed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Bech, J., absent.

Case Details

Case Name: Jett v. Lord
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Nov 11, 1915
Citations: 144 Ga. 234; 86 S.E. 1092; 1915 Ga. LEXIS 149
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
Log In