History
  • No items yet
midpage
Jeter v. Taliaferro, Stuart, & Co.
4 Munf. 80
Va.
1813
Check Treatment

the president pronounced the Court’s opinion, that the judgment of the County Court was erroneous in this, that the deposition of Humphrey Stuart was allowed to go in evidence to the jury, when the defendant, now plaintiff', who attended at Lynchburg the day the same was taken, was not allowed to cross-examine the said witness.

Both judgments reversed, and the cause remanded to the said Superior Court of Law, and from thence to the County Court for a new trial to be had therein, on which trial the deposition aforesaid is not to be read in evidence to the jury.

Case Details

Case Name: Jeter v. Taliaferro, Stuart, & Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Virginia
Date Published: Dec 1, 1813
Citation: 4 Munf. 80
Court Abbreviation: Va.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.