| Ky. Ct. App. | Dec 1, 1897
DELIVERED THE OPINION OP THE COURT.
It appears from this record that the circuit court of Hopkins county entered an order and judgment transferring the city of Madisonville from cities of the fifth class to cities of the fourth class, and afterwards the appellant instituted this action in the Hopkins circuit court against the said city, H. H. Holman, mayor, and other officers thereof, seeking to en
The defendants pleaded and relied upon the said orders and judgment of the circuit court transferring said oity to the fourth class, to which answer the plaintiff demurred, which demurrer was overruled by the court, and the court refused to grant the writ of prohibition or order of injunction and dismissed the petition, and from that judgment this appeal is prosecuted.
The sole questions presented for decision is as to the constitutionality of the act empowering- the circuit courts to make such transfers or assignments from one class to another class.
Section 156 of the Constitution reads as follows: “The cities and towns of this Commonwealth, for the purpose of their organization and government, shall be divided into six classes. The organization and powers of each class shall be 'defined and provided for by general laws, so that all municipal .corporations of the same class shall possess the same powers and be subject to the same restrictions. To the first class shall belong cities with a population of 100,000 or more; to the second class, cities with .a population, of 20,000 or more, and less than 100,000; to the third class, cities with a population of 8,000 or more, and less than 20,000; to the fourth class, cities and towns with a population of 3,000 or more, and less than 8,000; to the fifth class, cities and towns with a population of 1,000 or more, and less than 3,000; to the sixth class, towns with a population of less than 1,000. The General Assembly shall assign the cities and towns of
Sections 3661 and 3662, Kentucky Statutes, provide in substance that when the population of any city or town as .ascertained by the last federal census, or by the census taken pursuant to an ordinance of said town, authorizes it to be placed, in a class other than that in which it is, the authorities of such a town may enact an ordinance setting forth the population of the town, and may file a petition in the circuit clerk’s office declaring the facts, and, upon the proper steps being taken and evidence furnished to the cir•cuit court of the county, said court may enter a judgment assigning such town to the class to which it belongs as appears from the petition and exhibits, and thereafter such, town may be governed by and under the general laws relating to the class to which it has been assigned.
It is conceded that the transfer or assignment under consideration was made pursuant to and in accordance with
It will be seen that the power and duty of assigning towns to the different classes and changing such assignments is conferred alone upon the Legislature, and no grant of power is given the Legislature to delegate the power to make such change or assignment to any tribunal. It will be further seen that the power is given to the Legislature to provide for the creation or organization of new towns; yet the Legislature is required .to assign such towns to the classes to which they belong at the first session of the Legislature after such organization. It is further provided that no assignment shall be made except in pursuance to a law previously enacted and providing therefor.
It follows, therefore, that so much of sections 3661 and 3663 of the Kentucky Statutes, supra, as attempts to authorize the circuit courts to assign or transfer a town or city from one class to another is unconstitutional and void, and that the judgment of the Hopkins Circuit Court attempting; or assuming to transfer said city of Madisonville to cities or towns of the fourth class is null and void and of no effect.
The object of the framers of the 'Constitution doubtless was to provide a certain, safe and convenient means whereby tit might be readily ascertained to what class any city or town belonged, and, therefore, provided that all assignments or changes from one class to another should be by an act of the Legislature, which would always be a matter of record land readily accessible to the whole people. The requirement of the general law providing for such changes was deemed proper and necessary to the end that the citizens of the several towns should know in advance how and when such changes might be lawfully made.
For the reasons indicated the judgment appea’ed from is reversed and the cause remanded, with directions to grant the writ of prohibition and injunction prayed for and for proceedings consistent herewith.