278 P. 240 | Cal. Ct. App. | 1929
THE COURT.
The respondent moves that the peremptory writ of mandate heretofore issued herein be recalled for the purpose of correction.
[1] The writ was issued pursuant to the judgment in favor of the petitioner ordering a peremptory writ as prayed in the petition. (Jensen v. McCullough,
The motion to correct the peremptory writ is therefore granted and a corrected writ, reading as follows, is ordered served forthwith upon respondent:
"You are hereby commanded and required to pay to the State Treasurer of the State of California, the sum of Three Hundred ($300) Dollars, on account of the commitments of the inmates named in the petition on file herein from the County of San Benito to the Sonoma State Home for the period from December 1, 1926, to May 1, 1927; and you are further commanded and required to pay to said State Treasurer the sum of Four Hundred and Sixty ($460) Dollars, on account of the commitments of the inmates named in the petition filed herein from the County of San Benito to the Sonoma State Home for the period of May 1, 1927, to December 1, 1927; and you are required and commanded to make such payments at the time of the next settlement of the County Treasurer of San Benito County with the State of California pursuant to section 3866, Political Code, of the State of California; and we do also command that you make due return to us before this court how you have executed this writ within twenty (20) days after the date of service hereof.
"Witness the Honorable Joseph S. Koford, Presiding Justice of the District Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division Two, at the court room thereof in the City and County of San Francisco in said State, and the seal of said Court. Dated nuncpro tunc as of the 27th day of September, 1928.
"By the order of said Court:
*219"___________________,
"Clerk of the District Court of Appeal, State of California, in and for the First Appellate District."