| Or. | Jun 26, 1893
The objection made is that the notice of appeal does not state the error upon which the defendants and appellants rely for a reversal of the judgment. The first error assigned is to the entire instruction of the court to the jury, and is too vague' and general to notify the plaintiff of the particular issues to be tried on the appeal. This objection falls directly within the rule laid down in Murray v. Murray, 6 Or. 17" date_filed="1876-12-15" court="Or." case_name="Murray v. Murray">6 Or. 17, and Swift v. Mulkey, 17 Or. 532" date_filed="1889-05-03" court="Or." case_name="Swift v. Mulkey">17 Or. 532.
The judgment must be aepiemed.