History
  • No items yet
midpage
Jensen v. Foss
24 Or. 158
Or.
1893
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The objection made is that the notice of appeal does not state the error upon which the defendants and appellants rely for a reversal of the judgment. The first error assigned is to the entire instruction of the court to the jury, and is too vague' and general to notify the plaintiff of the particular issues to be tried on the appeal. This objection falls directly within the rule laid down in Murray v. Murray, 6 Or. 17, and Swift v. Mulkey, 17 Or. 532.

The judgment must be aepiemed.

Case Details

Case Name: Jensen v. Foss
Court Name: Oregon Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 26, 1893
Citation: 24 Or. 158
Court Abbreviation: Or.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.