Jennings v. State, 665 So. 2d 377

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order revoking appellant’s probation, except that we strike the finding that appellant violated condition 14. The evidence does not support this finding. In light of appellant’s remaining, numerous violations of the probation order, we find it unnecessary to remand this cause to the trial court. See Gavins v. State, 587 So.2d 487 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Wilson v. State, 506 So.2d 1170 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); McKeever v. State, 359 So.2d 905 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978).

AFFIRMED.

DELL, FARMER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Jennings v. State

Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Published: Jan 3, 1996

Citations: 665 So. 2d 377; 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 50; 1996 WL 1134; No. 95-0122

Docket Number: No. 95-0122

Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.