Jennings v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad

7 A.2d 96 | Pa. Super. Ct. | 1939

Argued April 17, 1939. For the reasons so clearly stated by Judge CARR, of the court below, in his dissenting opinion, which will be found in the reporter's statement, we are of opinion that the judgment on the award in favor of the claimant must be reversed and judgment entered for the defendant.¹

It is so ordered.

¹ See also Elder v. Penna. R.R. Co., 118 Pa. Super. 137,148, 180 A. 183; Martini v. Director General, 77 Pa. Super. 529,534; Phila. R. Ry. Co. v. Di Donato, 256 U.S. 327, 329;Bauchspies v. Central R. of N.J., 287 Pa. 590, 135 A. 728; Gluntv. Penna. R.R. Co., 249 Pa. 522, 95 A. 109.

Case Details

Case Name: Jennings v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad

Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Date Published: Apr 17, 1939

Citation: 7 A.2d 96

Docket Number: Appeal, 44

Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.