703 F. App'x 468
9th Cir.
2017

Jennafer YELLOWHORSE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KAYENTA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-15688

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

NOVEMBER 20, 2017

468

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

Submitted November 15, 2017 *

2378, 165 L.Ed.2d 368 (2006) (“[P]roper exhaustion of administrative remedies means using all steps that the agency holds out, and doing so properly (so that the agency addresses the issues on the merits).” (citation, internal quotation marks, and emphasis omitted)).

AFFIRMED.

Jennafer Yellowhorse, Kayenta, AZ, pro se.

MEMORANDUM **

Jennafer Yellowhorse appeals pro se from the district court‘s judgment dismissing for failure to state a claim her action alleging various federal claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir. 1998) (order). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Yellowhorse‘s action because Yellowhorse failed to allege facts sufficient to state any plausible claims. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009) (“[A] complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).

AFFIRMED.

Notes

*
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
**
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.