Jenkins v. StateJenkins v. State
- Reporters:
- ,
- Before:
- Goshorn, Daniel, Cowart
Harold Jenkins appeals the sentence imposed following his plea of no contest to one count of grand theft. Because his sentence is within the allowable guideline range, we affirm.
Jenkins, relying on Johnson v. State, 525 So.2d 964 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988), argues that the trial court incorrectly scored his 1965 armed robbery conviction as a life felony. The Johnson court, noting that at the time of Johnson‘s prior conviction the crime of robbery in Florida was not divided by degree, held:
Where, as here, the felony has no degree at the time of the defendant‘s conviction, we conclude the degree is “impossible to determine” in the language of Rule 3.701 d.5.(a)(3). The prior offense should therefore have been scored as a third degree felony.
In the case at bar, had Jenkins been convicted of armed robbery out-of-state, his guideline scoring would be governed by
We note direct conflict with Johnson.
AFFIRMED.
DANIEL, C.J., and COWART, J., concur.