History
  • No items yet
midpage
Jenkins v. Exeter Borough
3:15-cv-01353
M.D. Penn.
Oct 6, 2017
Check Treatment
Docket

*1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ELLED

SCRANTON EDWARD JENKINS, ⋮ ◻ ◻ ◻ ◻ ◻

Plain

V.

EXETER BOROUGH, et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

AND NOW, THIS DAY OF OCTOBER, 2017, upon review of Magistrate Judge Saporito's Report & Recommendation, (Doc.39), for clear error and manifest injustice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

  1. The Report & Recommendation, (Doc. 39), is ADOPTED for the reasons stated therein.
  2. Because Plaintiff did not amend his Fourth Amendment claim against Defendant Kachinsky in the time allotted by this Court's prior Order, (Doc. 38), that claim is now DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
  3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to TERMINATE Defendant Kachinsky from this action.
  4. The case is REMANDED to Magistrate Judge Saporito for further proceedings consistent with this Order.

*2

Case Details

Case Name: Jenkins v. Exeter Borough
Court Name: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Date Published: Oct 6, 2017
Docket Number: 3:15-cv-01353
Court Abbreviation: M.D. Penn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.