Jenkins Metal Shops, Inc. v. Pneumafil Corporation
427 F.2d 144
4th Cir.1970Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.
Upon a copious record and after observing the accused machine in operation, the District Judge concluded that the device does not infringe appellant’s patent. We have reviewed the record and are in accord with the Judge’s findings and conclusions. For the reasons stated in the District Court’s opinion, 303 F.Supp. 653 (W.D.N.C.1969), its judgment is
Affirmed.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
