30 Ind. 388 | Ind. | 1868
This was a suit upon a note executed by the appellants, upon which judgment was rendered.
On the trial the appellants objected to the introduction of the note in evidence, but the court, as appears by the bill of exceptions, “overruled the objection, for the reason that the objection to the evidence was not pointed out.” In Russell v. Branham, 8 Blackf. 277, it was held that the
The judgment is affirmed, with ten per cent, damages and costs.