58 W. Va. 662 | W. Va. | 1906
This is an action of ejectment brought by T. P. Jeffrey,
On the 30th day of December, 1786, there was granted by the Commonwealth of Virginia a tract of 2,000 acres of land to James Henry, assignee &c., said tract being known as Robert Lilburn No. 15, that the same became delinquent and forfeited to the Commonwealth; that in 1845 Peter G. Van Winkle, commissioner of delinquent and forfeited lands of Ritchie county, reported the same as delinquent and forfeited and caused the same to be surveyed, and under decree of the circuit superior court of law and chancery of said county sold 1430 acres, so much of said tract of 2,000 acres as he found not covered by other titles on which the taxes had been paid, at which sale William Campbell became the purchaser and received a deed from the said Y an Winkle, commissioner, therefor, dated the 9th of September, 1846. Campbell conveyed the same afterwards to David Kerr and others on the 10th day of October, 1864. The same commissioner, Van Winkle, in another proceeding against 2,000 acres granted battle Commonwealth of Virginia by patent 18th of April, 1786, to James Newport and others, attorneys in fact and trustees of Isaac Sidman, under like decrees of said court sold and conveyed 500 acres of said 2,000 acres to William Campbell who also afterwards, on the 10th day of October, 1864, conveyed the same to David Kerr and others. On the 2nd day of December, 1871, the said 1,430 acres was sold in the
The defendants claim under a grant from the Commonwealth of Virginia dated the 2nd day of April, 1860, for 970 acres based upon a survey made on the 29th day of June, 1858, made by virtue of Land Office Treasury Warrant No. 24983.
A verdict was rendered for the defendants. The plaintiffs moved to set aside the verdict and grant them a new trial on various grounds mentioned, which motion being considered was overruled and judgment entered thereon for defendants, to which judgment plaintiffs obtained a writ of error and su-persedeas. Some twentjr assignments of error are set out in the petition, but it seems unnecessary to discuss them in this case.
Plaintiffs rely upon their tax deed of Majr 26, 1879, from Amos, clerk of county court of Ritchie county for their title to the 970 acres and .on the deed of May 6, 1879, from the same clerk for the 439 acres, the former a part of the 1,430 acres sold for the taxes delinquent for the year 1871 sold June 8th, 1874. The evidence shows that the tract of 1,430 acres was not on the assessor’s books for any of the years 1873 to 1880, both inclusive, in the name of David Kerr and his co-owners, or of any one or more of them, so that the same was forfeited to the State for non-entry on the land books, being omitted therefrom more than five years; besides this, the said 1,430 acres was sold by the sheriff of Ritchie county on the 2nd day of December, 1871, to A. I. Rogers for the delinquent taxes in the name of David Kerr and others for the year 1870, and conveyed to the purchaser by said clerk Amos by deed dated November 20, 1873. So we have as to the 1,430 acres two outstanding titles; first, the title of Rogers and second, the forfeiture to the State. As to the 500 acre tract out of which the plaintiffs claim the 439 acres under said tax deed of May 6th, 1879, the record shows that the same was omitted from the assessor’s books for the years 1875 to 1880 both inclusive. Plaintiff’s deeds for the 900 acres and the 500 acres- dating in May, 1879, were after the
The forfeiture to the State of the title of the 1,430 acres and the 500 acres being complete before the plaintiffs took the deeds for the 900 acres and the 439 acres, they took no title.
There is no error in the judgment of the circuit court and it must be affirmed.
Affirmed.