History
  • No items yet
midpage
Jastro v. Francis
249 U.S. 581
SCOTUS
1919
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisc' tion *582upon the authority of Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225, 232; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79; Brolan v. United States, 236 U. S., 216, 218.

Mr. Alonzo B. McMillen, Mr. Alexander Britton, Mr. Evans Browne and Mr. F. W. Clements for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Bernard S. Rodey for defendants in error.

Case Details

Case Name: Jastro v. Francis
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Mar 10, 1919
Citation: 249 U.S. 581
Docket Number: No. 606
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.