History
  • No items yet
midpage
135 Ohio St. 3d 1412
Ohio
2013

Summit App. No. 26042, 2012-Ohio-5653.

O’Connor, C.J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. I, II, and IV only.

O’Donnell, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. II and IV only and hold the cause for the decision in 2011-0908, Anderson v. Barclays Capital Real Estate, U.S. Northern District of Ohio, Western Division, Case No. 309CV02335JGC.

French, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. I, II, and III only. Lanzinger, J., dissents.

Case Details

Case Name: Jarvis v. First Resolution Invest. Corp.
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 24, 2013
Citations: 135 Ohio St. 3d 1412; 986 N.E.2d 29; 2013-0118
Docket Number: 2013-0118
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In