Jarvis v. First Resolution Invest. Corp., 986 N.E.2d 29

Jarvis v. First Resolution Invest. Corp.

986 N.E.2d 29

Ohio

2013

Check Treatment

Summit App. No. 26042, 2012-Ohio-5653.

O’Connor, C.J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. I, II, and IV only.

O’Donnell, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. II and IV only and hold the cause for the decision in 2011-0908, Anderson v. Barclays Capital Real Estate, U.S. Northern District of Ohio, Western Division, Case No. 309CV02335JGC.

French, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. I, II, and III only. Lanzinger, J., dissents.