Jarvis v. California

291 U.S. 648 | SCOTUS | 1934

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Federal Compress & Warehouse Co. v. McLean, ante, pp. 17, 21-23; Southern Ry. Co. v. King, 217 U.S. 524, 534; Darnell v. Indiana, 226 U.S. 390, 398; Dahnke-Walker Co. v. Bondurant, 257 U.S. 282, 289; Roberts & Schaefer Co. v. Emmerson, 271 U.S. 50, 54-55; Liberty Warehouse Co. v. Burley Tobacco Growers Assn., 276 U.S. 71, 88.

midpage