Jarrett v. MosslihJarrett v. Mosslih
Ordered that the order of commitment is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.
The father’s concession that he failed to pay support constituted prima facie evidence of his willful violation of an order of support of the same court (Borofsky, S.M.), dated January 14, 2005 (see
The father’s contention that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel is without merit (see Matter of Giordano v Giordano, 259 AD2d 701, 702 [1999]).
Florio, J.P., Adams, Krausman and Rivera, JJ., concur.