History
  • No items yet
midpage
Jardine, Matheson & Co. v. Huguet Silk Co.
122 N.Y.S. 1056
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1910
|
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Miller, JJ.; Laughlin, J., dissented.






Dissenting Opinion

Laughlir, J.

(dissenting): I dissent upon the ground that the court erred in excluding the documentary evidence which the defendant claimed would tend to show that the parties contemplated an importation of silk from a particular firm; and upon the ground that the court erred in rejecting evidence with respect to the quality of the silk in the two bales purchased from Guerin ét Fils as it would bear on the question of damages, notwithstanding the fact that counsel for the defendant did not state that it was offered for that purpose and that this point was not raised by him upon the appeal.

Case Details

Case Name: Jardine, Matheson & Co. v. Huguet Silk Co.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: May 15, 1910
Citation: 122 N.Y.S. 1056
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.