History
  • No items yet
midpage
Janice Robinson v. Department of the Navy
692 F. App'x 160
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. [*]

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Janice Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Roberto Francisco Ramirez, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

*2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Janice Robinson appeals the district court’s order dismissing her employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Robinson v. Dep’t of the Navy, No. 7:15-cv-00004-H (E.D.N.C. filed Aug. 31, 2016 & entered Sept. 1, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

[*] The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d) (2012).

Case Details

Case Name: Janice Robinson v. Department of the Navy
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jun 26, 2017
Citation: 692 F. App'x 160
Docket Number: 16-2167
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.