History
  • No items yet
midpage
Janice Byrd v. Cassandra A. Pyle
284 U.S. App. D.C. 136
D.C. Cir.
1990
Check Treatment

902 F.2d 962

53 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 304, 284 U.S.App.D.C. 136

Janice BYRD, Appellant,
v.
Cassandra A. PYLE, Executrix, et al.

No. 89-7225.

United States Court of Appeals,
District of Columbia Circuit.

April 25, 1990.
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied June 18, 1990.

Prior report: D.C.C., 728 F.Supp. 1.

Before EDWARDS, SILBERMAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

1

Upon consideration of appellant's motion to vacate and to remand the case to the District Court, it is

2

ORDERED that the motion is granted and this case is remanded to the District Court with instructions to vacate the judgment and to dismiss the complaint with prejudice. See U.S. v. Munsingwear, 340 U.S. 36, 39, 71 S.Ct. 104, 106, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).

3

It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk transmit a certified copy of this order to the District Court in lieu of formal mandate.

Case Details

Case Name: Janice Byrd v. Cassandra A. Pyle
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Date Published: Jun 18, 1990
Citation: 284 U.S. App. D.C. 136
Docket Number: 89-7225
Court Abbreviation: D.C. Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.