James v. State
127 So. 922
| Ala. Ct. App. | 1930

The point of decision involved upon this appeal is the action of the court in overruling defendant's motion for a new trial. We discover no error in this connection. The evidence tended to show that this appellant was in possession of a fruit can or jar of corn whisky. He testified he was not. This conflict in the evidence made a jury question. We think the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict of the jury.

Affirmed.