James v. State
127 So. 922
Ala. Ct. App.
1930
Check Treatment

The point of decision involved upon this appeal is the action of the court in overruling defendant's motion for a new trial. We discover no error in this connection. The evidence tended to show that this appellant was in possession of a fruit can or jar of corn whisky. He testified he was not. This conflict in the evidence made a jury question. We think the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict of the jury.

Affirmed.