History
  • No items yet
midpage
James v. McCormack
1881 U.S. LEXIS 2119
| SCOTUS | 1881
|
Check Treatment
105 U.S. 265 (____)

JAMES
v.
McCORMACK.

Supreme Court of United States.

Mr. John Ambler Smith in support of the motion.

Mr. John W. Johnston and Mr. John A. Campbell, contra.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.

When the appellant was called and his appeal dismissed, the case had been nearly three years on the docket of this court. He had no brief on file, and was not present, either in person or by counsel. Under these circumstances the appellees were entitled, under Rule 16, to a dismissal. No notice of their intention to enforce the rule was necessary. The appellant has not excused himself for his default, and his case is clearly within that of Hurley v. Jones (97 U.S. 318), in which we announced our intention to enforce rigidly this salutary rule, and not to set aside defaults growing out of the neglect of counsel or parties, except for very good cause.

Motion denied.

Case Details

Case Name: James v. McCormack
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Dec 6, 1881
Citation: 1881 U.S. LEXIS 2119
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.