James S. Pacheco v. Matthew Carberry
389 F.2d 93
9th Cir.
1968
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM:

Appellant’s petition for a writ of habe-as corpus was dismissed in the district court. He appeals.

One of his points is appropriate for decision here now. That is his attack on the state search warrant and the fruits thereof. We find the warrant on the facts here not infirm, but valid under United States v. Ventresca, 380 U.S. 102, 85 S.Ct. 741, 13 L.Ed.2d 684.

As to all other points raised here, we find Pacheco has not exhausted his state remedies.

Affirmed.