History
  • No items yet
midpage
James Richardson Reece v. the State of Texas
03-25-00438-CR
| Tex. App. | Oct 31, 2025
|
Check Treatment

*1 TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 31, 2025 NO. 03-25-00438-CR James Richardson Reece, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF HAYS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES TRIANA, KELLY AND THEOFANIS DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA This is an appeal from the order of dismissal signed by the trial court on March 20, 2025. Having reviewed the record, the Court has determined that this appeal should be consolidated into cause number 03-25-00433-CR and that this cause should be dismissed. Therefore, the Court consolidates this cause, transfers all the records and filings in this cause number to cause number 03-25-00433-CR and dismisses cause number 03-25-00438-CR. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

Case Details

Case Name: James Richardson Reece v. the State of Texas
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Oct 31, 2025
Docket Number: 03-25-00438-CR
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Add Column
No results found

Notebook

Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.

What are you researching?

Are reduced-form regression models acceptable evidence of class-wide impact at the class certification stage?
If Delaware is a company's place of incorporation, is that enough to establish personal jurisdiction and venue in Delaware?
What is the meaning of "after the pleadings are closed" in rule 12c of the frcp? Do pleadings include motions to dismiss counterclaims? Preferred jurisdiction is MA District court, but would take anything from the 1st circuit.