History
  • No items yet
midpage
James Muhammad v. Correct Care Solutions
670 F. App'x 117
| 4th Cir. | 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

James Muhammad appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Muhammad v. Correct Care Solutions, No. 1:16-cv-00261-MGL (D.S.C. Mar. 1, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: James Muhammad v. Correct Care Solutions
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Nov 2, 2016
Citation: 670 F. App'x 117
Docket Number: 16-6457
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.