History
  • No items yet
midpage
James Conway v. L. H. Fugge, Prison Captain, and J. Schenk, Prison Sergeant
439 F.2d 1397
| 9th Cir. | 1971
|
Check Treatment

439 F.2d 1397

James CONWAY, Appellant,
v.
L. H. FUGGE, Prison Captain, and J. Schenk, Prison Sergeant, Appellees.

No. 26477.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

April 8, 1971.

James Conway, in pro. per.

Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.

Before HAMLEY, DUNIWAY and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant, a California state prisoner, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981 et seq., and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1343(3). The district court permitted the filing of the complaint in forma pauperis and then, on its own motion, dismissed it as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). This amounted to a dismissal of the action. See Williams v. Field, 394 F.2d 329 (9th Cir. 1968).

2

The district courts have especially broad discretion to decline to entertain civil actions in forma pauperis by prison inmates against their wardens and other prison officials. Williams v. Field, supra, at 331, and cases cited therein. The allegations of the instant complaint are very similar to those which were involved in the Williams case, in which we affirmed a dismissal.

3

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: James Conway v. L. H. Fugge, Prison Captain, and J. Schenk, Prison Sergeant
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Apr 8, 1971
Citation: 439 F.2d 1397
Docket Number: 26477_1
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.