Mitchell v. MartinMitchell v. Martin
- Reporters:
- , ,
- Before:
- Donald Russell, James Dickson Phillips, Chapman (per curiam)
James Calvin Mitchell, a North Carolina inmate, brought this
Thereafter, the defendants-appellees filed a petition for rehearing, contending that this court should rehear its decision to remand plaintiff‘s claim regarding denial of exercise and outdoor activity, and that the decision was in conflict with decisions of the Supreme Court and of this Circuit. The petition for rehearing was granted and the case was set down for formal briefing and oral argument.
For the reasons stated in our previous opinion1 we order that the entry of summary judgment on plaintiff‘s claim of denial of exercise and outdoor activity be vacated, and that the case be remanded to the District Court for the development of additional facts on this issue, particularly whether the plaintiff offered any proof of injury, with an opportunity to both parties to present any additional evidence they may desire.
REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.