85 So. 2d 653 | La. Ct. App. | 1956
This litigation emanates from the same building contract, the facts and pertinent issues of which are the same as those found in the-case of Moore Steel, Inc., v. Snow, La.App., 85 So.2d 648, with: the exception of the amount thereof and the judgment therefor which is $626.52, and the fact that the plaintiff instituted suit against Paul D. Snow, Jr., the owner, in addition to Charles Snow, the contractor, and Maryland Casualty Company, his surety. The suit against Paul D. Snow, Jr., was dismissed.
In the case of Moore Steel, Inc., v. Snow, we were of the opinion, for the reasons assigned therein, that the contractor, Charles Snow, and his surety, Maryland Casualty
For the reasons assigned the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
Affirmed,