History
  • No items yet
midpage
Jacobson v. Jacobson
49 N.Y.S.2d 166
N.Y. App. Div.
1944
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

There is here a controversy as to the existence, the content and effect of the oral agreement. Whether the contract, if made, is void and unenforeible under the Statute of Frauds (Personal Property Law, § 31, subd. 1), can be best determined upon a trial of the issues.

The order and the judgment should be reversed, with costs, and the motion for summary judgment denied.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.

Judgment and order unanimously reversed, with costs, and the motion denied. [See post, p. 848.]

Case Details

Case Name: Jacobson v. Jacobson
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jun 28, 1944
Citation: 49 N.Y.S.2d 166
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.