History
  • No items yet
midpage
Jackson v. Westchester Auto Credit Corp.
267 A.D. 890
N.Y. App. Div.
1944
Check Treatment

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents in the following memorandum: This was not a sale on credit but a sale of credit. The consideration charged for the credit extended was excessive under sections 352, 357 and 358 of the Banking Law, and therefore the conditional sales agreement was void. Accordingly, I dissent and vote to reverse and grant judgment for plaintiff.

Case Details

Case Name: Jackson v. Westchester Auto Credit Corp.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Mar 17, 1944
Citation: 267 A.D. 890
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.