History
  • No items yet
midpage
Jackson v. Varick
2 Wend. 294
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1829
Check Treatment
By the Court, Sutherland, J.

It is said that the defendant will not be able to recover from his grantor beyond six years interest on his covenant of warranty, and that therefore this case should form an exception to the general rule which governs in these cases. We do not think so. The rule is uniform, that if a party neglects to plead the statute of limitations, he loses his plea. The statute of limitations is a strict defence, and if the party lets it slip, the court will not relieve him. The motion is denied, with costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Jackson v. Varick
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: May 15, 1829
Citation: 2 Wend. 294
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.