Jackson v. State

50 N.J.L. 175 | N.J. | 1887

Per Curiam.

The judgment in this case should be affirmed, for the reasons given by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Dixon, Magie, Reed, Scudder, Van Syckel, Brown, McGregor, Paterson, Whitaker. 10. For reversal — None.